【摘要】 以我国图书情报领域11种期刊为例,调查其论文OA情况,分析OA论文与非OA论文的平均被引次数是否存在统计学意义上的显著差异。研究结果表明:我国LIS领域OA比例较高,但第三方存储所占比重较大;我国LIS领域期刊OA论文比非OA论文拥有更高的平均被引次数,且具有统计学意义,即存在OA引用优势,同时OA引用优势更多是一种通则性解释而非所有个案都适用。本文认为该OA引用优势可以通过资源获取的便捷性予以解释。本文的研究为当前国内学术期刊OA化提供了一个可能的理论支持。更多还原

【Abstract】 This study looks at articles in 11 journals in LIS field in China to investigate the open access issues and to seewhether the open access articles have a greater impact than the non-open access articles in statistical meanings. The resultis that: these articles have a relatively high OA adoption in most of which are third-party postings; OA articles have greatimpact upon non-OA articles although it merely can be seen as a general explanation other than suitable for all cases. Con-venience of resource access can be using to explain this citation advantage. Our study provides a possible theoretical sup-port for the OA adoption of domestic journals.更多还原