【摘要】 应当类型化分配不当得利"没有合法根据"的举证责任,区分给付型和非给付型两种类别。给付型不当得利中"没有合法根据"为给付人未实现给付目的,非给付型不当得利的"无合法根据"为财产移转客观上违反交换正义的利益平衡要求。给付型不当得利"没有合法根据"的举证责任由原告承担;非给付型不当得利又可区分为基于受损人自身行为产生的不当得利和侵害他人权益型不当得利,其中因受损人自身行为产生的不当得利中,"没有合法根据"的举证责任,由原告承担;而侵害他人权益型不当得利中,"没有合法根据"的举证责任,则由被告承担。更多还原

【Abstract】 It should be necessary to classify the burden of proof in illegal unjust enrichment as well as make a distinction between payment and non-payment of unjust enrichment. Payment means the payer doesn’t realize the benefit purpose in illegal unjust enrichment. Non-payment means that the property transfer violates the balance of benefit for the justice exchange objectively.The accuser is responsible for the burden of proof in the payment of illegal unjust enrichment. Non-payment of illegal unjust enrichment can be divided into two types. One is the unjust benefit based on the behavior of the damaged person, and the other is the unjust benefit gained from damaging others’ rights and interests. If the unjust enrichment is caused by the damaged person, the accuser shall undertake the responsibility for burden of proof on illegal basis. Otherwise, the defendant shall undertake it.更多还原