【摘要】 目的研究三种牙颈部牙本质敏感评估方法之间的相关性。方法本研究采用Yeaple电子压力敏感探针评估牙颈部牙本质对接触刺激的敏感程度,采用Schiff冷空气敏感指数和视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)评估冷空气刺激后的敏感程度。在0周、4周及8周进行检测,对所得数据进行分析。结果 Schiff冷空气敏感指数和视觉模拟评分法始终保持良好的相关性并具有统计学意义(R=0.26,P=0.003、R=0.49,P=4.18×10-9及R=0.57,P=5.32×10-12),Schiff冷空气敏感指数和Yeaple探针在8周时相关性良好(r=-0.41,P=2.01×10-6),Yeaple探针与视觉模拟评分法相关性较差。结论在评估牙颈部牙本质敏感的临床试验中,Schiff冷空气敏感指数和视觉模拟评分法可以二者选一,联合使用敏感压力探针法。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the correlation between three assessment methods for cervical dentine hypersensitivity. Methods The assessment methods used to quantify sensitivity were the Yeaple Sensitivity Sensor Probe,Schiff scale and Visual Analogue Scale（ VAS）. The data of 0,4thand 8thweeks were used to analyze the correlation of these three methods. Results The Schiff scale and VAS had good correlation consistency( r = 0.26,P = 0.003、r = 0.49,P = 4.18×10-9and r = 0.57,P = 5.32×10^-12) with statistical significance. Schiff scale and Yeaple scale had good correlation consistency at 8thweek( r =-0.41,P = 2.01×10^-6),while the correlation consistency of Yeaple scale and VAS was poor. Conclusion Schiff scale and VAS can be alternative at clinical trial,and combine with the Yeaple scale.更多还原