节点文献

失眠症的网络化认知行为治疗疗效研究

The efficacy of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 叶圆圆刘娟李训军刘雅贞郎莹林玲杨信举王延江蒋晓江

【Author】 YE Yuan-yuan;LIU Juan;LI Xun-jun;LIU Ya-zhen;LANG Ying;LIN Ling;YANG Xin-ju;WANG Yan-jiang;JIANG Xiao-jiang;Department of Neurology,Field Surgery Research Institute,Daping Hospital,Third Military Medical University;

【机构】 第三军医大学大坪医院野战外科研究所神经内科

【摘要】 目的比较网络化认知行为治疗(ICBT)、传统面对面认知行为治疗(CBT)及药物治疗对失眠症患者睡眠参数及焦虑和抑郁水平的影响,了解ICBT对失眠症的治疗效果。方法选取符合DSM-5诊断标准的失眠症患者79例,随机分为ICBT组(n=27)、CBT组(n=26)、药物治疗组(n=26),各组均进行连续8周的治疗。比较3组治疗前、治疗第4周、治疗结束时睡眠参数、焦虑及抑郁水平的差异。结果与治疗前相比,治疗第4周、治疗结束时3组睡眠参数明显改善,焦虑及抑郁水平明显下降,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗第4周,药物治疗组入睡潜伏期、总睡眠时间、入睡后觉醒时间等与ICBT、CBT组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗结束时,ICBT组、CBT组的入睡潜伏期、焦虑及抑郁水平均低于药物治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而ICBT组与CBT组比较,除抑郁水平外,焦虑水平及睡眠参数两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 ICBT对失眠症的改善速度较药物治疗慢,但是治疗结束时,其疗效优于药物治疗且与传统的面对面CBT效果差异不大。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behav ioral therapy(ICBT) for the treatment of insomnia by comparison of sleep parameters, degrees of anxiety and depression of the ICBT, with traditional faceto-face cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT) and pharmacotherapy for insomnia. Methods Seventy-nine cases meeting proposed DSM-5 criteria for insomnia disorder were randomly assigned to ICBT(n=27), CBT(n=26), and pharmacotherapy(n=26) group, and treated accordingly for 8 consecutive weeks. The sleep parameters, the levels of anxiety and depression in the 3 groups were compared and analyzed before, 4 weeks after and the termination of treatment. Results Comparing to that of pre-treatment, the sleep parameters were significantly improved, anxiety and depression levels obviously decreased after treatment for 4 and 8 consecutive weeks, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). After treatment for 4 consecutive weeks, the sleep latency, total asleep time and wake time after sleep were significantly different(P<0.05) when compared with pharmacotherapy group with ICBT and CBT groups. After the treatment, the sleep latency, anxiety and depression levels were lower in ICBT and CBT groups than those in pharmacotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). In addition, no significant difference(P>0.05) was found in sleep parameters and anxiety level between ICBT group and CBT group. Conclusion ICBT may display a slower effect on improving speed in falling asleep than the pharmacotherapy does, but the efficacy of ICBT is better than that of pharmacotherapy after treatment, and there is no significant difference compared to traditional face-to-face CBT.

【基金】 第三军医大学转化基金项目(2014XHZ10)~~
  • 【文献出处】 解放军医学杂志 ,Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年04期
  • 【分类号】R740
  • 【被引频次】25
  • 【下载频次】468
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络