节点文献

导向孔与筛孔和导向浮阀复合塔板的实验研究

Experimental study of directed valve tray with guide holes and sieves

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄本赫李玉安黄耀林周文勇

【Author】 HUANG Ben-he;LI Yu-an;HUANG Yao-lin;ZHOU Wen-yong;School of Chemical Engineering,East China University of Science and Technology;

【机构】 华东理工大学化工学院

【摘要】 设计了导向孔-导向浮阀复合塔板和筛孔-导向浮阀复合塔板,在板间距为600 mm,液流强度为20 m~3/(m·h),1 500 mm×450 mm的矩形塔内,以空气-水系统测试了3种塔板的干板压降,湿板压降,雾沫夹带率,漏液率,清液层高度,泡沫层高度水力学性能。由实验数据分别拟合了3种塔板干板压降,湿板压降,雾沫夹带率,漏液率的关联公式。实验表明:筛孔-导向浮阀复合塔板在压降和漏液率方面优于导向浮阀塔板;导向孔-导向浮阀复合塔板在水力学方面都优于导向浮阀塔板,是一种操作弹性大,具有更好水力学性能的优良塔板;选择合适的塔内件复合也是改善塔板性能的关键。

【Abstract】 Two types of trays,guide hole-directed valve tray and sieve-directed valve tray,were designed. The experiments were carried out in the tower whose plate spacing was 600 mm,intensity of flow was 20 m~3/( m·h),sectional area was 1 500 mm × 450 mm. Hydraulics performances of dry and wet pressure drop,entrainment rate,leakage rate,clear liquid height,foam layer height were tested in air-water system. The empirical formulas of three trays for dry and wet pressure drop,entrainment and leakage rate were obtained by data fitting. The results indicate that sieve-directed valve tray gets better than directed valve tray in pressure drop and leakage rate,and the guide hole-directed valve tray gets better than directed valve tray in all hydraulics performance,which has wider operation flexibility and excellent hydrodynamic performance. It is very important for combination trays to choose column internals.

  • 【文献出处】 化学工程 ,Chemical Engineering(China) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年04期
  • 【分类号】TQ053.5
  • 【被引频次】11
  • 【下载频次】139
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络