节点文献

论利用“过去的职务权限”收受或者索取贿赂行为的性质

On the Nature of Post Factum Bribery

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 温登平

【Author】 Wen Deng-ping;School of Law,Ji′nan University;

【机构】 济南大学政法学院

【摘要】 "利用职务上的便利"是指他人有求于公务人员的职务行为,公务人员以交付财物为前提而实施(包括放弃)职务行为,该财物成为其所许诺的职务行为的报酬或者对价。"利用职务上的便利"是表明财物与职务之间存在对价关系的要素,仅限于利用现在的职权。行为人在任职期间利用职务上的便利为请托人谋取利益,并与请托人事先约定,在其离职后收受请托人财物的,应当认为"约定"贿赂属于刑法规定的"索取"贿赂和"收受"贿赂的范畴,可以成立受贿罪。行为人在离职后借助原来的职务关系所形成的影响,通过其他国家工作人员职务上的行为,为他人谋取利益,并索取或者收受他人财物的,成立利用影响力受贿罪。行为人在任职期间利用职务便利为他人谋取利益,但是并未索取或者收受贿赂,也没有约定贿赂,在离职后收取他人的酬谢的,既没有受贿罪的实行行为,也缺乏受贿罪的故意,不成立受贿罪。行为人仅仅是在工作调整后收受贿赂的行为,应当成立受贿罪。

【Abstract】 In china′s bribery crime, "taking advantage of duty" is not the implementation behavior of bribery,but the element indicates that bribery money and position are the relation of consideration,which is similar to "duty-related"bribery in foreign countries,meaning that the correlation with duty is the requirement of bribery.The theory of protecting trust could legitimately solve many practical problems,such as post factum bribery and emotional investment.If a person takes bribes in his previous position,after changing the position he would expect improper payments in the future,which indicates the correlation with duty.If he does not ask for bribes while holding apost,he will not be convicted for lack of the correlation with duty.If takesing bribes as emotional investment,he may implement his duty improperly under the influence of the bribery,and hence end angering the impartiality of his position.So he could be convicted as bribery because the correlation with duty exists.

【基金】 中国法学会部级法学研究课题“刑法解释方法研究”(项目编号:CLS(2015)D062)
  • 【文献出处】 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年02期
  • 【分类号】D924.392
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】195
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络