【摘要】 考虑由零售商主导的"两个供应商一个零售商"组成的供应链中,分别在两个供应商都未投资RFID技术、只有一个供应商投资RFID技术以及两个供应商同时投资RFID技术三种情况下,结合供应商成本结构的差异,对比分析RFID技术的投资决策。由于模型解析解过于复杂,通过数值分析,着重考虑产品的替代率、RFID标签价格以及库存可获得率三个因素对供应链成员利润的影响。结果表明:一个供应商投资RFID技术,另一个供应商也会因此获利;产品替代率较高时,投资RFID对零售商更有利;标签成本较高时,成本较低时供应商投资RFID技术是有利的;当仅有一个供应商投资RFID技术时,未投资RFID的供应商的利润随着库存可获得率的提高而下降。更多还原

【Abstract】 The decision-making is taken into consideration in supply chain which consists of two competitive suppliers and one dominant retailer,who suffers from inventory inaccuracy.In the light of cost differences between two suppliers,both RFID and non-RFID cases are examined to investigate the decisions on RFID adoption.An intensive numerical study is conducted on the impact of three factors such as product substitution,RFID tag price,and inventory availability on supply chain decisions.It is found that non-RFID suppliers can benefit from RFID suppliers.Retailers can benefit from intensive competition when RFID is adopted.It is beneficial for the lowcost suppliers when RFID tag price is at high level.Additionally,the non-RFID suppliers’ revenues are decreasing with inventory availability when there is only one supplier investing in RFID technology.更多还原