节点文献
调查性反恐拘留比较研究与ICCPR分析及对我国之启示
Comparative Research and ICCPR Analysis of Investigatively Counter- terrorist Detention and Its Enlightenment for Our Country
【摘要】 如何在现行法律框架下先发制敌地进行反恐拘留是我国现行《反恐怖主义法》仍未解决的问题。法治发达国家通过降低对恐怖嫌犯的调查性拦截与调查性逮捕的标准并延长其拘留期限来修正根植于刑事法律框架内的调查性拘留体制,从而发展出了调查性反恐拘留这种修正体制,该体制具有较强的先发制敌的反恐功能。令人欣慰的是,该体制并不违反《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》关于任意拘留的禁止性规定。并且,它对我国具有重要启示:通过降低对恐怖活动人员的盘查、先行拘留和逮捕的启动标准,并延长对其先行拘留、侦查羁押和审查起诉期间的羁押期,打造适合我国的调查性反恐拘留体制。
【Abstract】 How to preemptively detain terrorist in the current legal framework is an unsolved problem in the current《Counter- Terrorism Act of 2016》of China. By lowering the threshold of investigative stop and investigative arrest of a terrorist suspect and prolonging his period of detention,developed countries under the rule of law modified the regime of investigative detention rooted in the criminal framework,leading to a correct regime of investigatively counter- terrorist detention,which is of the stronger capacity of countering terrorist. To one’s relief,this regime is compatible with prohibition against arbitrary detention under ICCPR. And it gives an important enlightenment for our country: create a regime of investigatively counter- terrorist detention appropriate to our country by lowering the threshold of stopping and first detaining and arresting a terrorist suspect,and by prolonging his period of detention of first detaining and custody for the sake of investigation and for conducting examination before prosecution.
【Key words】 investigative detention; investigatively counter-terrorist detention; ICCPR;
- 【文献出处】 法学杂志 ,Law Science Magazine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2016年09期
- 【分类号】D922.14;D998.2
- 【被引频次】6
- 【下载频次】284