【摘要】 目的探讨高血压患者自我管理与规范化管理模式的效果差异。方法回顾性分析340例高血压患者的临床资料,根据管理模式不同随机分为观察组和对照组,各170例。对照组实施高血压自我管理,观察组实施规范化管理。3个月后进行效果评价。结果两组高血压患者在实施自我管理和规范化管理之前,对于高血压知识的知晓率和治疗依从率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组170例高血压患者,经规范化管理高血压知识知晓率为71.18%,治疗依从率为90.59%,血压控制率为71.18%明显高于对照组,经比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论高血压患者经规范化管理,对于高血压知识的知晓率,治疗依从率和血压控制率均较自我管理明显提高,效果确切,更值得临床推广应用。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the difference of effects between self management and standardized management modes for hypertension patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 340 hypertension patients. They were randomly divided by different management modes into observation group and control group, with 170 cases in each group. The control group received hypertension self management, and the observation group received standardized management. Their effects were evaluated after 3 months. ResultsBefore implement of self management and standardized management, there were no statistically significant differences of awareness rate of hypertension knowledge and treatment compliance rate between the two groups(P>0.05). After receiving standardized management, the observation group with 170 cases had the awareness rate of hypertension knowledge as 71.18%, the treatment compliance rate as 90.59%, and the blood pressure control rate as 71.18%. Those were obviously higher than the control group, and their differences had statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion Implement of standardized management can provide increased awareness rate of hypertension knowledge, treatment compliance rate, and blood pressure control rate than self management. This method contains precise effect, and is worth clinical promotion and application.更多还原