【摘要】 作品定义与分类是著作权法的基础概念。《伯尔尼公约》未明确定义"作品",仅将作品分为"文学作品"和"艺术作品",这也是其他国家主要的作品类型。《TRIPS协定》要求WTO成员将计算机软件作为《伯尔尼公约》(1971年文本)中的文学作品加以保护,因此我国如何保护计算机软件正面临立法选择。《著作权法》和《修改草案》将"作品"分为许多具体类别,结果导致作品定义不准确,作品分类高度膨胀、矛盾和重叠。《草案》应以"三个领域两种作品"来定义作品,以"文学作品"取代"文字作品",废除"科学作品"和"口述作品"的定义和分类,同时,明确将"计算机软件"作为"文学作品"保护。更多还原

【Abstract】 The definition and classification of work are the basic concepts of copyright law. Berne Convention doesn’t explicitly define works, but only divides the works into literary and artistic works, which is followed by other countries. TRIPs agreement requires WTO members to protect computer software as literary works of Berne Convention(1971 version), so China is facing a legislative choice of how to protect computer software. Copyright Law and the amendment divide the works into a number of specific categories, consequently, the definition of the works is inaccurate, and the classification of the works is highly inflated, contradictory and overlapping. This paper argues that the amendment should define the work as two works in three areas. What’s more, the amendment should replace written works with literary works and repeal definitions and classification of scientific work and oral works, and protect explicitly computer software as literary works.更多还原