节点文献

某校护理学生评判性思维倾向研究

Critical thinking disposition of nursing undergraduates

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 王明弘权峰松潘淑霞王利群

【Author】 WANG Ming-hong;QUAN Feng-song;PAN Shu-xia;Department of Critical Care and Community Nursing,School of Nursing,Jilin Medical University;

【机构】 吉林医药学院护理学院急救社区护理教研室

【摘要】 目的:运用中文版评判性思维倾向量表(CTDI-CV)和中文简体加州评判性思维倾向量表(中译版CCTDI)衡量护理学生的评判性思维倾向,反思护理教学。方法:2015年5月购买75份中译版CCTDI,在吉林医药学院护理学院随机选取自愿参与评判性思维倾向调查的75名全日制大一~大三本科生,使用CTDI-CV和中译版CCTDI对学生进行评判性思维倾向调查。结果:CTDI-CV和中译版CCTDI总分均小于280分;除认知成熟度外,CTDI-CV和中译版CCTDI评判性思维倾向表现的6个方面和总分显示差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:两个量表反馈学生评判性思维倾向不足和存在差异,积极进行护理教学改革,提升学生评判性思维倾向。

【Abstract】 Objective To measure the critical thinking dispositions of nursing undergraduates with the Chinese version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory(CTDI-CV)and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory(CCTDI,simplified Chinese version),and to reflect on nursing teaching.Methods Seventy-five copies of CCTDI assessments were bought in May 2015.Seventy-five nursing undergraduates from freshmen to juniors in Jilin Medical University who participated voluntarily in the investigation of the critical thinking dispositions were randomly recruited and investigated with the two rating scales.Results Both the total scores of CTDI-CV and CCTDI were less than 280.There were statistically significant differences in the total score and six aspects of the critical thinking dispositions from the feedback of the two rating scale(P<0.05),except for cognitive maturity.Conclusions The undergraduates’ critical thinking dispositions are scant and different.It is imperative to actively carry out nursing teaching reform in order to improve the critical thinking dispositions of nursing undergraduate.

【基金】 吉林省高等教育学会高教科研课题(JGJX2015D229);吉林省教育科学规划课题(2011GH11250)
  • 【文献出处】 中国农村卫生事业管理 ,Chinese Rural Health Service Administration , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年11期
  • 【分类号】R47-4;G642
  • 【下载频次】70
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络