节点文献

颈动脉杂音在颈动脉病变中的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of carotid bruits carotid lesions

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李豪杰侯玉立凡芳

【Author】 Li Haojie;Hou Yuli;Fan Fang;Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University;

【机构】 山西医科大学第一临床医学院神经内科

【摘要】 目的探讨颈动脉杂音在颈动脉病变中的诊断价值。方法对185例缺血性脑卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的住院患者在住院当日进行颈动脉听诊,随后行颈动脉彩色多普勒超声检查。以颈动脉彩色多普勒超声结果为金标准,将研究对象依据病变轻重分为正常组、内膜增厚组、斑块组、轻度狭窄组、中度狭窄组和重度狭窄组,对数据进行统计学分析。结果颈动脉杂音诊断颈动脉病变、颈动脉斑块、颈动脉狭窄的灵敏度分别为51.4%、58.3%、79.2%;特异度分别为86.6%、73.4%、63.2%;阳性预测值为89.5%、50.8%、13.3%;阴性预测值为44.5%、78.9%、97.7%;诊断比值比(DOR)为6.84、3.86、6.53。结论颈动脉听诊可以作为颈动脉病变尤其是颈动脉斑块及狭窄的初步筛查,但不能替代颈动脉多普勒超声检查。

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of carotid bruits in carotid lesions. Methods A total of 185 inpatients with cerebral ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA) underwent bilateral carotid auscultation and then carotid Doppler ultrasound examination. Taking carotid Doppler ultrasound examination as golden standard, the research object according to the severity were divided into normal group, plaque group, mild stenosis group, moderate stenosis group and severe stenosis group. Statistical analysis was performed on data. Results The sensitivity of carotid bruit in diagnosis carotid lesion, carotid plaque, carotid stenosis was 51.4%, 58.3%, 79.2%; The specificity was 86.6%, 73.4%, 63.2%; The positive predictive value was 89.5%, 50.8%, 13.3%; The negative predictive was 44.5%, 78.9%, 97.7%. Diagnostic odds ratio was 6.84, 3.86, 6.53. Conclusion The carotid auscultation can be used as early screening method of carotid lesions, but cannot replace carotid Doppler ultrasound examination.

  • 【文献出处】 中华临床医师杂志(电子版) ,Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年24期
  • 【分类号】R743.3
  • 【下载频次】71
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络