节点文献

箱庭疗法的评估进展及其发展趋势

The Sandplay Assessment and Its Development Tendency

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吕仁慧张日昇吴林桦马西娟

【Author】 LV Ren-hui;ZHANG Ri-sheng;WU Lin-hua;MA Xi-juan;Institute of Developmental Psychology,Beijing Normal University;

【机构】 北京师范大学发展心理研究所

【摘要】 箱庭疗法(又称沙盘游戏)在心理咨询和治疗中得到了广泛的应用,其用于临床诊断与评估的潜力颇受关注。以荣格分析心理学为基础并结合实际经验,Sandplay创立者卡尔夫及其他箱庭研究者提出了很多可供参考的评估标准。实证研究侧重箱庭评估量表的编制及箱庭作为评估工具的信、效度检验,计算机技术也被运用至箱庭客观内容的分析中来弥补主观评估的不足。未来研究应关注箱庭评估的信效度检验,建立箱庭制作者的主观内容评估标准,并客观理性的看待箱庭标准化评估。

【Abstract】 Sandplay therapy is widely applied in psychological counseling. Its potential advantages in clinical diagnosis has been a hot spot for a long time. Based on Carl. Jung’s Analytical psychology and extensive clinical experience, Kalff and other researchers summarized many referential standards for sand tray assessment. The empirical study places great emphasis on developing the sandplay assessment scale with mature reliability and validity. Computer technology have covered the shortage of subjectivity in objective content assessment of sandplay. Future research should focus on the test and retest of validity and reliability of sandplay assessment, building the assessment criterions for the subjective narrative, and standardized assessment should be placed in a reasonable position.

【关键词】 箱庭评估信度效度个体故事
【Key words】 SandplayAssessmentReliabilityValidityPersonal story
  • 【文献出处】 中国临床心理学杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年06期
  • 【分类号】B849
  • 【被引频次】23
  • 【下载频次】1889
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络