节点文献

审判中心主义对职务犯罪侦查的影响——以非法证据排除为视角

On the Influence of Judgment Centralism on the Investigation of Duty Crimes——From the Perspective of Illegal Evidence Exclusion

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 韩利钱鹏曾静

【Author】 Han Li;Qian Peng;Zeng Jing;Southwest University of Political Science and Law;

【机构】 西南政法大学

【摘要】 由侦查中心至审判中心的转变是刑事诉讼制度的发展趋势,是法治文明发展程度的重要标志。审判中心主义要求刑事诉讼中的侦查、起诉都围绕审判为中心展开,相关制度的设计应以审判为中心而设置,在其之下,侦查权的发动与运行受制于法院与法官,对侦查程序产生着重要影响。我国职务犯罪案件由检察机关侦办这一区别于一般犯罪侦查的不同特性,对职务犯罪侦查提出了不同的要求。研究职务犯罪中的非法证据排除问题,需要在了解审判中心主义的基础上,对职务犯罪及职务犯罪中的证据问题进行深入的研究,进而探讨职务犯罪在侦查阶段进行非法证据排除的进路。

【Abstract】 The developing trend of criminal procedure system is changing from investigation center to judgment center,which has become the main symbol of legal civilization. Judgment centralism requires that the investigation and accusation in criminal procedure should center around judgment and the relevant systems should be set up around judgment. Under this circumstance,the start and operation of investigation right shall be confined by the courts and judges,which greatly influences the investigation procedure. The duty criminal cases different from other types of crimes are handled by procuratorial organs in China,which gives different requirements as to the investigation of duty crimes. The issue of illegal evidence exclusion in duty crimes shall be based on judgment centralism to discuss the path of excluding illegal evidence in the phase of investigation.

【关键词】 审判中心职务犯罪非法证据排除
【Key words】 judgment centralismduty crimesillegal evidenceexclusion
  • 【文献出处】 政法学刊 ,Journal of Political Science and Law , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年06期
  • 【分类号】D925.2
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】481
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络