节点文献

左西替利嗪口服液治疗儿童慢性荨麻疹78例临床观察

Clinical Observation of Efficacy of Levocetirizine Oral Solution on 78 Cases with Chronic Urticaria in Children

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 付桂莉郑源泉卢静静黄美莲

【Author】 FU Gui-li;ZHENG Yuan-quan;LU Jing-jing;HUANG Mei-lian;Department of Dermatology,Wuhan Children’s Hospital;

【机构】 武汉市儿童医院皮肤科

【摘要】 目的观察左西替利嗪口服液治疗儿童慢性荨麻疹的疗效和安全性。方法将入选的156例慢性荨麻疹患儿随机分为两组,治疗组(78例)予左西替利嗪口服液治疗,对照组(78例)予西替利嗪口服液治疗,均1次/d,连用28d,分别于治疗第14和28天时观察临床疗效和不良反应。结果治疗第14和28天时,治疗组有效率分别为84.62%和87.18%,对照组分别为79.49%和83.33%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组不良反应发生率(6.41%)明显低于对照组(16.67%),主要有口干、嗜睡,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论左西替利嗪口服液和西替利嗪口服液治疗儿童慢性荨麻疹的疗效相当,但左西替利嗪安全性高于后者。

【Abstract】 Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of levocetirizine oral solution in pediatric patients with chronic urticaria. Methods A totle of 156 children with chronic urticaria were enrolled and divided into 2 groups randomly. The treatment group( 78 cases) were treated with levocetirizine oral solution one-time-a-day for 28 days,and the control group( 78 cases) were treated with cetirizine oral solution with the same durg use frequence. Efficacy and adverse reactions were observed at day 14 and day 28. Results The effective rates in the treatment group were 84. 62% and 87. 18% at day 14 and day 28,and that in the control group were79. 49% and 83. 33% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups( P > 0. 05).However the adverse reaction in treatment group( 6. 41%) were lower than that in control group( 16. 67%),which include mouth dryness,dizziness. There were significant differences between the two groups( P < 0. 05). Conclusion There is no difference between levocetirizine and cetirizine in the treatment of chronic urticaria in children. Levocetirizine produced fewer side effects than cetirizine.

  • 【文献出处】 中国皮肤性病学杂志 ,The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年04期
  • 【分类号】R758.24
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】228
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络