【摘要】 目的通过比较MEBO(湿润烧伤膏)与普通换药治疗外伤性皮肤缺损,回顾性评价MEBO治疗外伤性皮肤缺损临床效果。方法 2008年12月~2011年12月对56例外伤性皮肤缺损的患者资料进行回顾性分析,随机分为2组,MEBO组(A组)35例和普通换药组(B组)21例,对2组患者的创面渗出、创面愈合时间、创面感染率等进行比较分析。结果 2组患者均获得随访,随访时间8~21个月,平均18个月。A组创面的平均痊愈时间15.3±3.6 d明显短于B组21.5±4.3 d(P<0.05),A组优良率82.9%,高于B组57.1%,A组无创面感染,B组创面感染3例(P<0.05)。结论 MEBO治疗小面积浅层组织和皮肤缺损临床疗效好,应用方便,值得推广。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To retrospectively analyze the results of treatment with MEBO for skin defect due to trauma in comparison with ordinary dressing change. Methods In Dec 2008 to Dec 2011, 56 cases of skin defect due to trauma with MEBO were analyzed retrospectively and the treatment effect was observed. MEBO was used in 35 patients(group A), Ordinary dressing change in 21 patients(group B). The clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 methods,including wound ooze、wound healing time and wound infection rates. Results All cases were followed-up(mean 18 months, range 8~21 months). The wounds had healed completely. Wound healing time was 15.3±3.6 days in group A, 21.5±4.3 days in group B(P<0.05). The excellent and good rate was 82.9% in group A, 57.1% in group B. No wound infection in group A, cases of wound infection in Group B(P<0.05). Conclusion MEBOis efficacious in treating Small area of shallow tissue and skin defect in due to trauma.更多还原