【摘要】 成人利用意图信息对他人行为进行评价时存在不稳定的现象.通过两个实验对大学生法律判断和道德判断中意图信息的利用情况进行考察,从而探讨运用两种不同规则进行判断时的认知差异和特点.研究发现:当行为存在重大负性后果时,道德判断受意图因素影响,而法律判断不受意图因素影响;当行为不存在重大负性后果时,法律判断和道德判断都受意图因素的影响,道德判断对负性意图的合法性不敏感.更多还原

【Abstract】 When evaluating the behavior of others,adults tend to consider the intent information,but there is some unsteadiness in using the information of the intention.In order to provide an empirical ground to the research of the cognitive differences and the characteristics of judgment by two different rules,two experiments were used in our study to investigate the role of intent information in the judgment by the rule of law and the code of morality.We found that moral judgment was affected by intention,but legal judgment was not,when the behavior had significant negative consequences.In contrast,when the behavior had no significant negative consequences,both legal judgment and moral judgment were affected by intention,while moral judgment was not sensitive to the legitimacy of the negative intentions,and legal judgment was sensitive to it.更多还原