【摘要】 [目的]结合自然科学期刊及社会科学期刊评价指标体系与评价方法,探索一个适合于护理期刊的评价指标体系。[方法]选择我国10个省市高校图书馆领域、护理期刊编辑领域及护理学科领域专家24名为研究对象,采用文献研究法、德尔菲法、层次分析法及数理统计方法构建护理期刊学术影响力评价指标体系。[结果]经过两轮专家咨询,最终确定评价指标为3个一级指标、8个二级指标。一级指标的权重分别为期刊引用指标(0.730 6)、期刊来源指标(0.188 4)、网络传播指标(0.081 0);二级指标组合权重按权重大小排序,依次为总被引频次(0.361 6)、影响因子(0.227 3)、来源文献量(0.1118)、他引总引比(0.097 1)、平均引文数(0.047 0)、高被引论文数(0.044 6)、地区分布数(0.029 6)、Web下载量(0.081 0)。各级指标权重均满足一致性检验,所得权重系数符合逻辑。[结论]本研究构建的指标体系适用于护理期刊的评价,且体现了护理专业的特色。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:To explore a suitable evaluation system of nursing journals combined with Natural science and social science journals evaluation system and method.Methods:A total of 24 experts in the library field,nursing journals field and nursing disciplines field in universities in 10 provinces in China were selected as the research objects,using literature research,Delphi,AHP and mathematical statistics were used for construction of evaluation indexes of nursing journals academic influence.Results:After two rounds of expert consultation,evaluation indexes were determined including three first-level indicators,eight secondary indicators.Right-level index weights were Journal Citation Index(0.730 6),periodicals source index(0.188 4),the network spread index(0.081 0);secondary indexes combination weights were weighted more heavily small order,followed by total citations(0.361 6),the impact factor(0.227 3),the amount of source documents(0.1118),he cited overall lead ratio(0.097 1),the average number of citations(0.047 0),the number of highly cited papers(0.044 6),the number of distribution areas(0.029 6),Web downloads(0.081 0).All levels of index weight were met consistency test,the resultant weighting coefficient was logical.Conclusion:The constructed evaluation system in this study is suitable for evaluation of nursing journals,and reflects the characteristics of the nursing profession.更多还原