【摘要】 目的探究生物反馈电刺激与中药灌肠合用对缓解慢性盆腔痛的有效性。方法选取从2013年8月到2014年8月在汕头大学医学院第一附属医院接受治疗的慢性盆腔疼痛患者342例。将患者分为观察组和对照组。对照组A进行单一的生物反馈电刺激治疗;对照组B进行单一的中药灌肠治疗;观察组进行生物反馈电刺激与中药灌肠合用治疗。结果治疗后,观察组患者治愈40例,有效64例,总有效率为77.6%;对照组A患者治愈16例,有效50例,总有效率为61.1%;对照组B患者治愈12例,有效46例,总有效率为58.0%。观察组疗效优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组疼痛分数为(2.08±0.34)分,对照组A疼痛分数为(3.82±1.41)分,对照组B疼痛分数为(3.75±1.38)分。观察组在减缓疼痛感的疗效优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在治疗女性慢性盆腔痛时,生物反馈电刺激能够减轻患者疼痛感觉,再与中药灌肠合用治疗时效果更明显。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To study the effect of biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with traditional Chinese medicine enema on alleviating the pain of patients with chronic pelvic pain. Methods 342 cases with chronic pelvic pain were treated from 2013 August to 2014 August in our hospital, and were randomly divided into 3 groups. Control group A received single biofeedback electrical stimulation therapy; control group B received single Chinese herbal enema; the observation group received biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with traditional Chinese medicine enema treatment.Results After treatment, 40 patients in the observation group were cured and 64 were effective, with the total effective rate of 77.6%. In control group A, 16 cases were cured 16 and 50 were effective, with the total efficiency of 61.1%; in control group B, 12 cases were cured and 46 were effective, with the total effective rate of 58%. The curative effect of the observation group was better than those of the control groups(P <0.05). The pain scores after treatment of the observation group, control group A and control group B were 2.08±0.34,3.82±1.41 and 3.75±1.38 points, respectively.In the reduction of pain treatment, in the observation group, slow pain treatment effect was the best(P <0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain, biofeedback electrical stimulation could relieve pain feeling. When combined with the traditional Chinese medicine enema the effect was more significantly better.更多还原