【摘要】 本文系统分析了运用2年影响因子(IF2)、5年影响因子(IF5)和论文影响分值(AIS)对SCI/SSCI期刊质量进行评价的优缺点,并以管理科学领域为例,分析了基于IF2、IF5、AIS和专家评价法所得期刊质量排序的相关性。研究结果表明,基于影响因子(IF)和专家评价法所得排序结果有很大差异,呈现出非显著正相关关系,相关系数的均值为0.336。但是,基于论文影响分值和专家评价法所得排序结果呈显著正相关,相关系数的均值达到0.702。该研究结果表明,对管理科学领域的SCI/SSCI期刊,运用论文影响分值比影响因子所得评价结果更准确。更多还原

【Abstract】 This research systematically analyzes the strength and weakness of assessing SCI/SSC1 journal quality using2-year impact factor(IF2),5-year impact factor(IF5) and article influence score(AIS).Then,taking management science as an example,we analyze the correlation between the rankings derived using IF2,IF5,AIS,and expert ratings.The results show that the correlation between the ratings using impact factor and expert ratings is insignificant,and the mean value of the correlation coefficients is 0.336.However,the rankings using article influence score and expert ratings are significantly correlated,and the mean value of the correlation coefficients is 0.702.This implies that in the field of management science,we can derive better ratings using AIS than using IF.更多还原