节点文献
循证干预对PICC置管患者满意度及并发症的影响
Evidence-based intervention in PICC catheter for the complications,and satisfaction
【摘要】 目的:观察循证干预在PICC置管期对患者并发症发生率和满意度的影响,以避免或减少置管并发症,提高患者满意度。方法:将120例PICC置管患者随机分为常规干预组和循证干预组,每组各60例。常规干预组在PICC置管期给予常规干预,循证干预组在PICC置管期给予给予循证干预,比较两组患者PICC置管并发症发生率和患者满意度。结果:护理干预1个月后,常规干预组患者PICC置管发生并发症8例,并发症发生率为13.4%;循证干预组发生并发症2例,并发症发生率为3.4%,循证干预组置管并发症的发生率显著低于常规干预组(P<0.05);两组患者满意度调查,循证干预组为98.3%,显著高于常规干预组85.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:循证干预能够明显降低患者PICC置管并发症的发生率,显著提高患者满意度。
【Abstract】 Objective To explore evidence-based intervention in PICC catheter complications,and satisfaction effect,in order to avoid or reduce catheter complications,improve patient satisfaction. Methods 120 patients with PICC catheter were randomly divided into two groups,conventional intervention group evidence- based intervention group 60 cases,conventional intervention group in PICC catheter period to give regular intervention,evidence- based intervention group in PICC catheter period to give evidence- based intervention,compared two groups of patients with PICC catheter complications and patient satisfaction. Results 1 month after statistics found that regular PICC catheter intervention group patients 8 cases,complications incidence was 13. 4%,the evidence- based intervention group occurred in 2 cases,the incidence was 3. 4%,evidence- based intervention group the incidence of catheter complications was significantly lower than conventional intervention group( P < 0. 05); Satisfaction survey,evidence- based intervention group was 98. 3%,significantly higher than that of conventional intervention group 85. 0%,comparing the two groups with significant difference( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Evidence- based intervention can significantly reduce the incidence of PICC catheter in patients with complications,improve patient satisfaction.
【Key words】 Peripheral venipuncture; Central venous catheter; Evidence-based interventions;
- 【文献出处】 中国民族民间医药 ,Chinese Journal of Ethnomedicine and Ethnopharmacy , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年11期
- 【分类号】R-03;R473.73
- 【下载频次】44