节点文献

即刻种植与延期种植在单颗前牙修复的临床效果比较

Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed implant placement supporting single-tooth prostheses

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 谢霓朱友家

【Author】 XIE Ni;ZHU You-jia;Department of Stomotology,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University;

【机构】 武汉大学中南医院口腔科

【摘要】 目的:比较即刻种植和延期种植在单颗前牙修复中的临床效果。方法:收集单颗前牙种植修复病例40例,随机分为即刻种植组和延期种植组,每组各20例,种植后分别在3,6,12个月随访,观察临床效果和种植手术前后种植体周围硬组织的影像学变化,对结果进行统计学分析。结果:1年后随诊两组均无种植失败病例,3个月复诊时即刻种植组边缘骨吸收量(0.47±0.29)mm,延期种植组(0.61±0.26)mm;6个月时即刻种植组(0.75±0.44)mm,延期种植组(0.89±0.26)mm;12个月时即刻种植组(0.92±0.49)mm,延期种植组(0.96±0.25)mm。两组间种植手术前后硬组织变化无统计学意义。结论:即刻种植在单颗前牙种植修复中可以取得与延期种植一样的临床效果,且缩短了缺失牙的修复周期。

【Abstract】 Objective:To compare clinical outcomes and radiological change of immediate versus delayed implant placement supporting single-tooth prostheses. Method:Forty single-tooth implant prostheses cases had been recruited and randomized assigned to immediate implant group and delayed implant group.Each group is consist of 20 patient. Clinical outcomes and radiographic evaluations of peri-implant hard tissues were carried out after 3,6 and 12 months.Then we make statistical analyses of the results. Result:No implant failed to integrate in each group.The marginal bone loss assessed at 3months was 0.47±0.29(Group 1),0.61±0.26(Group2),assessed at 6 months was 0.75±0.44(Group 1),0.89±0.26(Group2),at assessed 12 months 0.92±0.49(Group 1),0.96±0.25(Group2).There is no statistically significant differences in each time period between the two groups. Conclusion:It is suggested that immediate implant can not only have the same clinical outcome as delayed implant,but also shorten the period of single-tooth replacement.

【关键词】 即刻种植延期种植预后成功率
【Key words】 immediate implantdelayed implantoutcomesuccess rate
  • 【文献出处】 临床口腔医学杂志 ,Journal of Clinical Stomatology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年12期
  • 【分类号】R783.6
  • 【被引频次】14
  • 【下载频次】151
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络