节点文献

扁桃体低温等离子切除术与传统挤切术临床疗效比较

Coblation assisted tonsillection versus traditional dissection tonsillection: a comparison of clinical effects

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄方名李东海吴静

【Author】 HUANG Fang-ming;LI Dong-hai;WU Jing;ENT Department,The Third People’s Hospital of Bengbu;

【机构】 安徽省蚌埠市第三人民医院耳鼻喉科

【摘要】 目的观察比较扁桃体低温等离子切除术与传统挤切术临床疗效,为扁桃体切除治疗提供临床依据。方法选取我科2011年1月-2014年1月扁桃体手术108例分为观察组、对照组每组各54例,比较2组术中及术后出血量、出血发生率、术后患者不适发生率等。结果与对照组相比,观察组的术中及术后出血量、出血发生率、术后患者不适发生率均显著减少(P值均<0.05)。结论与传统挤切术比较,低温等离子切除术具有出血量少、出血发生率减少、术后患者不适发生率减少。

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the clinical effects of coblation assisted tonsillectomy and traditional dissection tonsillectomy so as to provide basis for tonsillar excision. Methods Data of 64 patients who underwent traditional dissection tonsillectomy( control group,n = 54) and coblation-assisted tonsillectomy( observation group,n = 54) between January 2011 and January 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Blood loss during operation and after operation,incidence of bleeding and the incidence of discomfort of postoperative patients were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group,blood loss during operation and after operation,incidence of bleeding and incidence of discomfort of the postoperative patients decreased in the observation group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Coblation assisted tonsillectomy can reduce blood loss and decrease bleeding complications compared with traditional dissection tonsillectomy.

  • 【文献出处】 淮海医药 ,Journal of Huaihai Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年03期
  • 【分类号】R766.9
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】57
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络