节点文献
人格权独立成编的再批评
A Re-criticism of Personality Right as an Independent Part
【摘要】 人格利益的范围具有不确定性和持续的扩张性,如果以与财产权、身份权等民事权利相同的构造方法设置人格权制度,会将人格权保护限缩和封闭于民事生活领域。人格权编对人格权种类及范围的封闭性设计,限制了侵权责任法的适用范围。对人格权保护的强化,必须将人格权保护的一般条款和具体条款移入侵权责任制度,使其对人格尊严的保护范围扩及至人们社会生活的全部领域。由于人格权为法定权利且纯属"防卫型"权利,在存在侵权责任编的情况下,人格权编只能单纯确认人格权的类型,其应有的条文为数甚少且不具有行为规范的性质,不能作为裁判依据,故人格权独立成编没有应用价值。
【Abstract】 Because the range of personality interests is uncertain and continually expansionary,if the system of personality right is set up in the same way as the civil rights like property right,creditor’s rights and status right,the protection of personality right will be narrowed and restricted to the field of civil life. The closed design of personality right types and range limits the scope of the tort liability law application. To strengthen the protection of personality right,it is necessary to move the general terms and special terms of personality right into the tort liability system and expand the scope of protection of human dignity to all fields of people ’s social life. For the legality and the pure defensiveness of personality right,the independent personality right part but simply confirm the types of personality right in the background of tort liability part,then the number of its terms is few and terms have no character of behavior rules,which result in that it cannot serve as the judicial basis. Therefore,it has no value to design the personality right as an independent part in civil code.
- 【文献出处】 比较法研究 ,Journal of Comparative Law , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年06期
- 【分类号】D913
- 【被引频次】51
- 【下载频次】2800