节点文献

基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析——以石羊河流域为例

The Ecological Risk Assessment of Arid Inland River Basin at the Landscape Scale:A Case Study on Shiyang River Basin

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张学斌石培基罗君刘海龙魏伟

【Author】 ZHANG Xue-bin;SHI Pei-ji;LUO Jun;LIU Hai-long;WEI Wei;College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University;College of Resources and Environmental Science, Gansu Agricultural University;

【机构】 西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院

【摘要】 合理评估流域生态风险,对于优化流域景观格局、建立流域生态风险预警机制、降低流域生态环境风险、维护流域生态功能具有十分重要的意义。文章以干旱内陆河典型流域为研究对象,以三期遥感数据为基础,构建生态风险指数,结合ArcGIS的空间分析功能,对流域生态风险的时空特征进行分析,结果表明:1987—2010年,流域景观发生较大了变化,草地面积减少12.73×104hm2,未利用地面积增加15.59×104hm2;将生态风险划分为5个等级,其中低生态风险区向流域上游不断迁移,面积减少31.89×104hm2,较低生态风险区向上游和中游不断延伸,面积增加29.30×104hm2,高生态风险区向下游不断扩展,面积增加58.69×104hm2;流域生态风险转换方式共有7种,低向高等级转化的总面积为122.56×104hm2,高向低等级转化的总面积为6.12×104hm2,生态风险呈增高趋势。

【Abstract】 It is significant to make a reasonable assessment of ecological risk to optimize the landscape pattern, establish the ecological risk alarm mechanisms, minimize the risk of ecological environment and maintain the ecological function in river basin. The study, based on the remote sensing data of 1987, 2000 and 2010, chooses the typical arid inland river basin as the subject, divides the study area into 20 km× 20 km risk area and analyzes the temporal-spatial distribution pattern of ecological risk in Shiyang River Basin. Proceeding from the structure of landscape ecological system, the landscape disturbance degree index, the fragile index and the loss degree index are used to build the integrated ecological risk index(ERI) in the study with the help of spatial analysis of GIS. The results show that: 1) Great changes of landscape have taken place in the study area during 1987-2010, arable, woodland and grassland area have respectively reduced by 2.46×104hm2, 4.77×104hm2and 12.73 × 104hm2, while the residential land, water and unused land area have increased by 1.79×104hm2, 2.58 ×104hm2and 15.59 ×104hm2, which mean that the predominant of arable land, woodland and grassland decrease gradually, while the predominant of water, unused land and residential land increase gradually. 2) According to scope of ERI, 5 ecological risk grades are separated by ‘natural breaks’. If 0.12 ≤ERI ≤0.17, then the ecological risk grade is extremely low; if 0.17 <ERI ≤0.22, the ecological risk grade is low; if 0.22< ERI ≤ 0.27, the ecological risk grade is medium; and if 0.27 <ERI ≤0.32, then the ecological risk grade is high, or the ecological risk grade is extremely high. 3) At the early stage of the study period, the main ecological risk grades are extremely low and high, with the elapse of time, three ecological risk models coexist in the study area, i.e., extremely low, low, and extremely high, which means that the threaten of the ecosystem is increasing. It embodies in the space that the extremely low ecological risk areas shrink to upstream, and the area reduces 31.89×104hm2; the low ecological risk areas spread to the upper and middle stream, and the area increases 29.30 × 104hm2; the extremely high ecological risk areas expand to the downstream, and the area increases 58.69 × 104hm2. 4) There are seven conversion modes of ecological risk, among which the overall performance is from low-grade ecological risk to high-grade ecological risk. The conversion area from low-grade to high-grade is 122.56 × 104hm2, while conversion area from high-grade to low-grade is 6.12×104hm2.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金项目(41271133,40971078,41261104);国家社科基金青年项目(12CTJ001)
  • 【文献出处】 自然资源学报 ,Journal of Natural Resources , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年03期
  • 【分类号】Q149
  • 【被引频次】153
  • 【下载频次】2789
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络