【摘要】 目的:在大学生群体中引入无聊倾向量表(Boredom Proneness Scale,BPS),探讨该量表在中国文化背景下的因素结构,并检验其信效度。方法:采用BPS中文版调查了1230名大学生,收回有效问卷1129份。另用特质孤独量表、特质焦虑量表、自评抑郁量表和自评无聊倾向条目在90名大学生中检验效标关联效度。3周后随机抽取64名大学生进行重测。结果:BPS中文版包括内部刺激和外部刺激2个维度,低卷入、高卷入、高刺激需求、低刺激需求和缺乏耐性5个分量表,共20个条目;验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好(χ2/df=1.60,CFI=0.91,TLI=0.89,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.06);5个分量表的内部一致性信度在0.57~0.81之间,重测信度在0.69~0.83之间;BPS中文版具有较好的效标关联效度。结论:BPS中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于大学生的无聊倾向测量。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To introduce and investigate the psychometric attributes of the Chinese version of Boredom Proneness Scale(BPS). Methods: 1230 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of BPS, in which 90 students were further asked to complete Trait Loneliness Scale, Trait Anxiety Inventory, Self-Rating Depression Scale, and a self-assessment boredom item. 64 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of BPS three weeks after the first investigation. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded two reliable dimensions in the questionnaire: external stimulation and internal stimulation, which contained five factors: low engagement, high engagement, high stimulating requirements, low stimulating requirements and lack of patience, with Cronbach’a of these subscales ranged 0.57 from 0.81; the test-retest reliabilities ranged 0.69 from 0.83. The BPS was of good criterion validity as well. Conclusion: The Chinese version of BPS can be used as an effective instrument to assess the boredom status in Chinese university students.更多还原