【摘要】 本文通过h指数度量研究者的学术声誉,重点考察了机构声誉、学缘关系和性别对个人学术声誉的影响及其内在机制。从总体平均值来看,留校研究者h指数显著高于非留校的研究者,女性的h指数显著低于男性研究者。进一步的计量分析显示:(1)机构学术声誉对个体学术声誉的影响既有筛选效应,又有协同效应,但是目前国内机构内高水平协同水平较低,筛选效应起着更为重要的作用;(2)学缘效应更多地来自筛选效应,在控制了机构学术水平后,在非海归样本中,学缘关系对个体学术声誉不再有显著影响;(3)个体学术声誉的性别差异在高水平的机构中比较突出,实证结果支持家庭投入对科研投入的"挤出效应"假说,不支持学术市场的"性别歧视"假说。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper measured economists’ academic reputation with h index,focusing on the effect of institutional origin and gender on the academic reputation. The statistics shows that male researchers’ h index is higher than female researchers’,and the h index of researchers graduated from the employed universities is higher than of those recruited from other universities. We found that:( 1) Institution reputation plays both screening effect and synergistic effect,but the screening effect is more important since the cooperation in the institution is limited.( 2) Institutional origin plays a screening role. There is no significant effect of institutional origin on the personal h index once we control the institution reputation.( 3) Our empirical results support crowding out hypotheses on the gender difference of h index,which don’t provide evidence of "gender discrimination"in academic market.更多还原