节点文献

头孢曲松治疗早期梅毒患者临床疗效的荟萃分析

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical controlled trials on effect of ceftriaxone sodium for treatment of early syphilis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 秦家碧杨土保冯铁建杨帆洪福昌莫衍石蔡玉玲关阳刘晖

【Author】 QIN Jia-bi;YANG Tu-bao;FENG Tie-jian;YANG Fan;HONG Fu-chang;MO Yan-shi;CAI Yu-ling;GUAN Yang;LIU Hui;Central South University;

【机构】 中南大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系深圳市慢性病防治中心皮肤性病科

【摘要】 目的评价头孢曲松治疗早期梅毒的疗效及安全性,为梅毒有效治疗方案制定提供临床证据。方法从建库到2012年7月初检出810篇文献,采用荟萃分析评价国内头孢曲松治疗早期梅毒的临床随机对照试验,计数资料的效应值采用相对危险度(RR),计量资料采用均数差(珚x),两者均以95%可信区间(CI)表示,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果共纳入15篇文献,合计1 371例患者,头孢曲松治疗早期梅毒6个月的有效率与苄星青霉素相比(RR:1.18,95%CI:0.78~1.80)增加18.0%,12个月后有效率增加8.0%(RR:1.08,95%CI:0.89~1.30),差异均无统计学意义;在皮损消退时间上,头孢曲松的时间要短于苄星青霉素(珚x:-2.28,95%CI:-2.90~-1.66),头孢曲松与普鲁卡因青霉素相比,6个月(RR:1.14,95%CI:0.98~1.34)和12个月(RR:1.02,95%CI:0.95~1.10))有效率增加14.0%和2.0%,差异均无统计学意义;联合药物治疗1周皮损消退率是单独治疗的1.47倍(RR:1.47,95%CI:1.20~1.81);不良反应主要表现为恶心、呕吐、头晕、肌肉酸痛、短时间内局部发热症状加重,但不良反应发生率在各研究组间无差异。结论头孢曲松治疗早期梅毒疗效与苄星青霉素和普鲁卡因青霉素相当,联合苄星青霉素时比单独用苄星青霉素疗效要好,建议今后采用头孢曲松联合苄星青霉素治疗早期梅毒。

【Abstract】 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone sodium for treatment of early syphilis,so as to provide clinical evidences for valid therapeutic strategy of syphilis.METHODS 810documents recorded from the establishment of the database to the beginning of Jul 2012,were evaluated for the randomized controlled trials of domestic ceftriaxone sodium for treating early syphilis via meta-analysis;the effect value of categorical data adopted relative risk(RR)rate and measurement data employed difference in means(珚x);both of them were indicated by 95% confidential interval;P less than 0.05indicated a difference with statistical significance.RESULTS A total of 15documents involving 1371patients were selected.Compared with penicillin(RR:1.18,95% CI:0.78~1.80),the effect rate of ceftriaxone sodium for treating early syphilis increased 18.0% within 6 months and increased 8.0%after 12months(RR:1.08,95% CI:0.89~1.30),the difference between them had no statistical significance.In terms of skin lesion subsiding,ceftriaxone sodium took shorter time than benzathine penicilli(珚x:-2.28,95%CI:-2.90~-1.66).Compared with procaine benzathine penicillin,the effect rate of ceftriaxone sodium increased 14.0%and 2.0% after 6months(RR:1.14,95% CI:0.98~1.34)and 12months(RR:1.02,95% CI:0.95~1.10)respectively,indicating no difference in statistical significance.The one-week subsiding degree of skin lesion with the combination treatment grew 1.47times(RR:1.47,95%CI:1.20~1.81).The adverse reaction were Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction,anaphylaxis,nausea,emesis,dizziness,muscular soreness,increased local pyrexia in a short time,while the adverse reaction rate had no difference between each study groups.CONCLUSION The efficacy of ceftriaxone sodium on early syphilis was equivalent to that of the combination of benzathine penicillin and procaine benzathine penicillin.However,the ccombination therapy of ceftriaxone sodium and benzathine penicillin created a better effect than benzathine penicillin did alone.So the ccombination therapy of ceftriaxone sodium and benzathine penicillin on treatment of early syphilis was recommended in the future.

【基金】 中央高校科研基金资助项目(2012zzts029);湖南省研究生科研基金项目(CX2012B076)
  • 【文献出处】 中华医院感染学杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年08期
  • 【分类号】R759.1
  • 【被引频次】15
  • 【下载频次】296
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络