【摘要】 通过自力救济的方式解决医疗纠纷缺乏客观评价医学、医事法学专业问题的机制,导致许多医疗纠纷无法得到客观公正地解决,从而进一步引发通过"医闹"的方法解决医疗纠纷、预防性医疗等一系列深层次问题。许多地区行政部门为引导医患双方理性维权纷纷出台了限制公立医院自力救济权限的规定。实践中多表述为"患方索赔要求在1万元以上的必须通过医疗纠纷人民调解或诉讼途径解决,公立医院不得与患方自行协商"。业界对此类条款褒贬不一。作者试图从意义及法律性质层面阐述限制协商权的必要性、可行性,为实践中协商权限规定提供合理合法的依据。更多还原

【Abstract】 The mechanism by way of self remedy lack of objective evaluation of professional medical, medical law problems of medical disputes, resulting in many medical disputes cannot be solved the objective and fair. Thus further triggered by "medical" method to solve the medical dispute, preventive health care and a series of deep-seated problems. Many areas of administrative departments to guide the doctorpatient rational adults have issued regulations limiting the public hospital self relief rights, in practice as "who claim in ten thousand Yuan of above must be solved by the medical dispute mediation and litigation, the public hospital and patient negotiation shall not". There is no uniform opinion medical circles on such terms. This paper tries to expound the necessity of restricted negotiation power from the meaning and legal nature of level, to practice negotiation authority shall provide reasonable and legitimate basis.更多还原