【摘要】 通过对商鞅方升、新莽嘉量容积与"容如黄钟"的讨论,探析了律与度量衡的关系及黄钟律之争的原因。认为秦汉量升,其量相同;"秬黍为法","容如黄钟"。度律量衡,先尺次律,再量后衡,相因而生。即先"以黍累尺"为度制之本,次"以尺定律",并因九相关而成古律尺、古黄钟及律尺、黄钟;再"以律(管)度容",即以黄钟律管之长为尺长基准,定制量器;后"以容立重"生权衡。而"九九八十一、宫"的黄钟之争,其原因是由于历代有不同基准的尺型,采用何尺型量测和认定古代容器更是争议的焦点。更多还原

【Abstract】 Through the discussion of Shang Yang Fangsheng and Xinmang Jialiang,both ancient Chinese capacity measures,this paper studies the relationship of tuning system and weights and measures and reason for the dispute of Huangzhong.It believes that capacity measures in Qin and Han dynasties are the same.Measure goes first,then goes chi which is based on the length of Huangzhong.The reason for the dispute of Huangzhong lies in different standards of measuring instruments in different dynasties.The focus of the dispute is the selection of measuring instruments and affirmation of ancient container.更多还原