节点文献

地佐辛与舒芬太尼用于直肠癌根治术后镇痛效果比较

Comparison of intravenous analgesia with dezocine and sufentanil after radical resection of rectal cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 郭晋铎冯晋禄赵真英蔡越李宇刘毅邓丽云张勤功

【Author】 GUO Jin duo;FENG Jin lu;ZHAO Zhen ying;CAI Yue;LI Yu;LIU Yi;DENG Li yun;ZHANG Qin gong;Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Provincial;

【机构】 山西省肿瘤医院

【摘要】 目的:比较地佐辛与舒芬太尼用于直肠癌根治术后的镇痛效果。方法:将60例直肠癌根治手术患者随机分为两组,D组予地佐辛0.7 mg/kg加生理盐水至60 mL,S组予舒芬太尼1.5μg/kg加生理盐水至60 mL,行静脉镇痛(PCA)治疗。采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Ramsay镇静评分评估患者疼痛程度和镇静情况,同时记录不良反应的发生情况。结果:两组镇痛评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),D组镇静评分与不良反应发生率低于S组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:地佐辛可以安全有效地用于直肠癌术后镇痛。

【Abstract】 Objective: To compare the efficacy of dezocine and sufentanil in patient intravenous analgesia after radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods: Sixty patients arranged for radical resection of rectal cancer were randomly divided into dezocine group( group D) and sufentanil group( group S). After operation two groups were respectively given by intravenous injection( PCA) were decozine 0. 7 mg /kg( group D) and sufentanil 1. 5 μg /kg( group S) which were diluted to 60 mL by Visual Analogue Scale( VAS) and Ramsay scores after operation and adverse effects were recorded and compared. Results: There was no significant difference in the VAS scores( P > 0. 05). The Ramsay scores and adverse effects in group D were significantly lower than those in group S( P < 0. 05). Conclusion: The postoperative analgesia with dezocine can serve as a safe and effective method of analgesia in patient of radical rectal cancer.

【关键词】 地佐辛舒芬太尼直肠癌术后镇痛
【Key words】 dezocinesufentanilrectal cancerpostoperative analgesia
  • 【文献出处】 临床医药实践 ,Proceeding of Clinical Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年07期
  • 【分类号】R735.37
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】36
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络