节点文献
中国劳动争议仲裁时效期间流变考
Textual Research on the Change and Historical Development of the Limitation Period of Chinese Labor Dispute Arbitration
【摘要】 基于对整体利益、社会秩序的保护,才使得时效制度有存在的意义。兼顾劳动法的社会功用,以及保护劳动者权益的价值取向,现行立法将劳动争议仲裁时效延至1年,有一定进步;但仍嫌不足,可考虑将之延长为普通民事诉讼的2年时效。并应将时效起算点回归到《劳动法》中"劳动争议发生之日"的标准,并将之解读为"一方当事人向另一方当事人的意思表示明确表示异议之日"。
【Abstract】 The significance of the existence of prescription system is just based on the protection of overall interests and the social order.Considering both the social function of the labor law and the protection of laborors’ rights and interests,the current legislation will extend the limitation period of labor dispute arbitration to a year.Certain progress has been made but is still not enough.The limitation period can be extended to two years as the ordinary civil proceedings.The starting point can be returned to "the date when the labor dispute happens"in the system arrangement in The Labor Law and interpreted as "the date when one party expresses clearly the objection to the other party."
- 【文献出处】 绥化学院学报 ,Journal of Suihua University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年08期
- 【分类号】D922.5
- 【被引频次】4
- 【下载频次】112