【摘要】 目的探讨间歇性蓝光照射和持续蓝光照射治疗新生儿黄疸的优劣性。方法选取新生儿黄疸80例(均为足月儿),随机分为两组,分别进行间歇性蓝光照射治疗和持续性蓝光照射治疗,对比两种治疗方式的疗效(包括治愈率、不良反应发生率、住院天数和住院费用),分析二者的差异。结果两种方式治疗新生儿黄疸在治愈率和不良反应发生率上均无显著性差异,住院天数和住院费用明显减少。结论间歇性蓝光照射和持续性蓝光照射治疗新生儿黄疸均具有十分显著的疗效,不良反应发生率无明显差异,但是持续性蓝光照射治疗疗程短,住院费用少,患儿家属容易接受。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the curative effects of intermittent blue light phototherapy and persistent blue light phototherapy. Methods 80 cases of term infantswith neonatal jaundice were divided into two groups randomly. Group one was treated with intermittent blue light phototherapy,group two was treated with persistent blue light phototherapy. Compared the therapeutic effects( including recovery rate,adverse reaction incidence rate,hospital day and cost of hospitalization). Results The difference of incidence rate of adverse reaction between the two groups was not statistically significant,but persistent blue light phototherapy need less hospital stay and cost. Conclusions The persistent blue light phototherapy is better than the intermittent blue light phototherapy on hospital day and cost of hospitalization,and it is more acceptable for patient’s family.更多还原