节点文献

政府监督和农户决策:巩固退耕还林成果因素分析——基于24省2120户退耕农户的调查结果

Government Supervision and Farm Household Decision-making: Analysis of the Consolidation of Results of Grain for Green Projects——Based on the Survey of 2120 Households from 24 Provinces

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 谢晨黄东于慧袁梅彭伟彭道黎吴涛

【Author】 Xie Chen;Huang Dong;Yu Hui;Yuan Mei;Peng Wei;Peng Daoli;Wu Tao;China National Forestry Economics and Development Research Center;Division of Rural Development and Forestry Reform, State Forestry Administration;School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Remin University of China;School of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University;

【机构】 国家林业局经济发展研究中心国家林业局农村林业改革发展司中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院北京林业大学林学院

【摘要】 在传统的农户生产决策中,政府监督的作用被忽视。承担退耕还林任务的农户是否仍然服从收益最大化原则,政府监督在巩固退耕还林成果中是否有效?为回答此问题,文章从理论上推导出巩固退耕还林的3种生态产出,并用全国24省2120个退耕农户的调查数据,采用多元Logit模型,验证了政府监督和农户决策在巩固退耕还林中的作用。研究发现,政府监督有效,在巩固退耕还林成果、获得退耕生态产出方面发挥显著作用;当政策激励与农户利益一致的情况下,遵循收入最大化原则退耕农户遵守退耕还林政策规定;贫困和少数民族退耕农户经营退耕林木有困难;农村劳动力和土地资源禀赋影响退耕还林成果巩固。

【Abstract】 In traditional farm household production decision making, governance was neglected. CCFP farmers still follow principle of profit maximization? Does CCFP governance effective in solid CCFP achievement? To address this issue, the paper points out 3 types of ecological outputs in theory. By using 2120 CCFP household survey data from 24 provinces and running ordered Logit model, the paper tests government and farmers’ role in CCFP. It was found that governance has been effective in solid CCFP achievements and providing ecological outcomes; profit maximization households will follow CCFP regulations when policy incentive accord with households’ benefits; poor and ethnic farmers face more difficulties in CCFP management; rural labor shortage as well as low farmland endowment impact CCFP targets.

  • 【文献出处】 林业经济 ,Forestry Economics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年03期
  • 【分类号】F326.23
  • 【被引频次】12
  • 【下载频次】235
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络