节点文献

Characterizing a proton beam with two different methods in beam halo experiments

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 蒋洪平傅世年彭军程鹏黄涛李鹏李芳李健刘华昌刘美飞孟鸣孟才慕振成荣林艳欧阳华甫孙彪王博田建民王标王盛昌姚远徐韬光徐新安辛文曲赵富祥曾磊周文中

【Author】 JIANG Hong-Ping;FU Shi-Nian;PENG Jun;CHENG Peng;HUANG Tao;LI Peng;LI Fang;LI Jian;LIU Hua-Chang;LIU Mei-Fei;MENG Ming;MENG Cai;MU Zhen-Cheng;RONG Lin-Yan;OUYANG Hua-Fu;SUN Biao;WANG Bo;TIAN Jian-Min;WANG Biao;WANG Sheng-Chang;YAO Yuan;XU Tao-Guang;XU Xin-An;XIN Wen-Qu;ZHAO Fu-Xiang;ZENG Lei;ZHOU Wen-Zhong;Accelerator Center, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;

【机构】 Accelerator Center, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

【摘要】 In beam halo experiments,it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beamIn order to simulate the beam dynamics properly,we must first know the correct initial beam parameters.We have used two different methods,quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the transverse phase-space properties of the proton beam.The experimental data were analyzed by fitting to the 3-D nonlinear simulation code IMPACT.For the quadrupole scan method,we found that the RMS beam radius and the measured beam-core profiles agreed very well with the simulations.For the multi-wire scanner method,we choose the case of a matched beam.By fitting the IMPACT simulation results to the measured data,we obtained the Courant-Snyder parameters and the emittance of the beam.The difference between the two methods is about eight percent,which is acceptable in our experiments.

【Abstract】 In beam halo experiments, it is very important to correctly characterize the RFQ output proton beam.In order to simulate the beam dynamics properly, we must first know the correct initial beam parameters. We have used two different methods, quadrupole scans and multi-wire scanners to determine the transverse phase-space properties of the proton beam. The experimental data were analyzed by fitting to the 3-D nonlinear simulation code IMPACT. For the quadrupole scan method, we found that the RMS beam radius and the measured beam-core profiles agreed very well with the simulations. For the multi-wire scanner method, we choose the case of a matched beam. By fitting the IMPACT simulation results to the measured data, we obtained the Courant-Snyder parameters and the emittance of the beam. The difference between the two methods is about eight percent, which is acceptable in our experiments.

【基金】 Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(91126003);Key Development Program of Basic Research of China(2007CB209904)
  • 【文献出处】 Chinese Physics C ,中国物理C , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年08期
  • 【分类号】O572.3
  • 【下载频次】33
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络