【摘要】 目的探究团体辅导对失恋大学生的干预效果。方法选取症状自评量表(SCL-90)中精神病性量表测量结果为无,SAS得分大于40,SDS得分大于40的正经历着失恋,分手1个月以上的大学生作为研究对象。实验组被试进行为期8次的团体辅导,探讨团体辅导活动对大学生失恋引起的焦虑、抑郁和应对方式的影响效应。用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和应对方式问卷调查失恋大学生焦虑、抑郁及其应对方式特点。结果 1在前测中,实验组和对照组在焦虑,抑郁水平和应对方式上的得分没有差异;2团体结束后,实验组与对照组焦虑(t=-4.122,P<0.01)、抑郁(t=-3.355,P<0.01)得分差异显著;在应对方式方面,相比对照组被试,实验组被试开始更多的运用"问题解决"(t=2.468,P<0.05)、"求助"(t=4.174,P<0.01)这两种积极的应对方式;33个月后的追踪测表明,实验组与对照组焦虑(t=-3.514,P<0.01)、抑郁(t=-6.118,P<0.01)得分差异显著;在应对方式方面,实验组被试运用了更多的"问题解决"(t=3.581,P<0.01)、"求助"(t=4.521,P<0.01)这两种积极的应对方式,对照组被试运用了更多的"自责"(t=-4.045,P<0.01)这种消极的应对方式。结论团体辅导能有效地帮助失恋大学生摆脱失恋困境;团体辅导可以在一定程度上改善成员的应对方式。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the intervention effect of group counseling on the college students being lovelorn. Methods Selecting college students whose psychotic score in SCL- 90 being none,SAS scores greater than 40,SDS scores greater than 40 as our subjects. A group counseling of eight times was carried out for them. The effect of group counseling on anxiety,depression and coping styles was measured. Self- rating Anxiety Scale( SAS),Self- rating Depression Scale( SDS) and Coping Style Questionnaires( CSQ) were used to assess. Results 1 There were no significant differences in anxiety,depression and coping style scores between two groups before group counseling. 2 There were significant differences in anxiety( t =-4. 122,P < 0. 01),depression( t =-3. 355,P < 0. 01),problem solving( t = 2. 468,P < 0. 05) and help( t = 4. 174,P < 0. 01) between two groups after group counseling. 3 Three- month tracking showed that there were significant differences in anxiety( t =-3. 514,P < 0. 01),depression( t =-6. 118,P < 0. 01) problem solving( t = 3. 581,P< 0. 01),help( t = 4. 521,P < 0. 01) and blame( t =-4. 045,P < 0. 01) between two groups. Conclusion Group counseling can be effective in helping the college students being lovelorn,and can improve coping style of members in a certain extent.更多还原