节点文献

快速检测试剂条、镜检和PCR在疟疾诊断中的应用研究

Study on the application of RDT,microscopy examination and PCR on malaria

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 营雅茹李卫东张滔姜静静许娴虞晨赵立胜徐署东王建军

【Author】 YING Ya-ru;LI Wei-dong;ZHANG Tao;JIANG Jing-jing;XU Xian;YU Chen;ZHAO Li-sheng;XU Shu-dong;WANG Jian-jun;Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Anhui Medical University;Department of Control and Prevention of Endemic and Parasitic Diseases,Anhui Center for Disease Control and Prevention;

【机构】 安徽医科大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计系安徽省疾病预防控制中心地方病与寄生虫病科

【摘要】 目的采用快速检测试剂条(rapid diagnostic test,RDT)、镜检及聚合酶链反应(polymerase chain reaction,PCR),3种检测方法进行疟原虫检测,比较3种方法在疟疾诊断中的敏感性、特异性,为科学分析检测结果和探究RDT能否在基层替代疟原虫镜检提供依据。方法收集安徽省2012年1月~2013年3月确诊以及疑似病例抗凝血148份,血片148张,采用RDT进行检测,并与镜检法和PCR的结果对比分析其敏感性与特异性。结果 148份血样采用RDT、镜检和PCR 3种方法检测结果阳性率分别为43.24%、36.49%、37.84%,经配对2检验RDT阳性率高于镜检和PCR;镜检和PCR均检出2例卵形疟,而RDT结果为阴性;以镜检为标准,对间日疟和恶性疟进行分析得出,RDT的敏感度为100%,特异度87%,阳性预测值81%,阴性预测值100%;以PCR为标准,对间日疟和恶性疟进行分析得出,RDT的灵敏度为100%,特异度89%,阳性预测值84%,阴性预测值100%。3种方法均检出间日疟16例,而对恶性疟分别为RDT检出48例,镜检检出36例,PCR检出38例。结论 RDT对间日疟和恶性疟敏感性较高,可以覆盖全部阳性病例,在今后疟疾低流行时期RDT有望取代基层镜检对疟疾进行诊断。

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the sensibility,specificity and consistency among microscopic examination, rapid diagnostic test( RDT) and polymerase chain reaction( PCR) in the diagnosis of malaria,and provide the basis for deciding whether RDT can replace microscopic examination in county level hospitals. Methods 148 suspected and confirmed blood samples,and 148 blood smears were collected and detected by microscopic examination,RDT and PCR from January 2012 to March 2013. Then,all the results were compared in pairs. Results A total of 148 samples were tested. The positive rates of RDT,microscopic examination and PCR were 43. 24%,36. 49% and 37. 84%,respectively. Two plasmodium ovale were detected by microscopic examination and PCR,but not by RDT. Compared to microscopy,the sensitivity of RDT was 100%,specificity 87%,positive predictive value 81%,negative predictive value 100%; Compared to PCR,the sensitivity of RDT was 100%,specificity 89%,positive predictive value 84%,negative predictive value 100%. 16 cases diagnosed as plasmodium vivax were detected by all of the three methods. 48 plasmodium falciparum were detected by RDT,36 plasmodium falciparum were detected by microscopy examination,and 38 detected by PCR. Conclusions The sensitivity and specificity of RDT are very high,and overwhelming majority of p. v and p. f can be detected by RDT. Hence,RDT can totally replace microscopic examination to diagnose malaria in low malaria epidemic period.

【关键词】 疟疾显微镜检查聚合酶链反应
【Key words】 MalariaMicroscopyPCR
  • 【文献出处】 中华疾病控制杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年02期
  • 【分类号】R531.3;R181
  • 【被引频次】30
  • 【下载频次】643
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络