节点文献

决不能把伪简当作“中华文明的根脉”

The Fake Bamboo Slips should not be Regarded as “the Roots of Chinese Civilization”

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 房德邻

【Author】 FANG De-lin;The History Departnient,Peking University;

【机构】 北京大学历史系

【摘要】 《清华大学藏战国竹简》第1辑中有一篇《耆夜》,使用若干汉代以后才出现的词语,其中有些词语是长期演化生成的,这证明清华简是现代人的伪作。清华简整理者也看出《耆夜》有些词语有作伪的嫌疑,但未实事求是地指出来,反而用掩饰性的注释为之遮掩,把伪简注释成真简。有人把这样一部清华简称为"中华文明的根脉",岂不荒唐?

【Abstract】 The Bamboo Manuscripts Qiye(耆夜)found in Volume 1of Tsinghua University Warring States Bamboo Manuscripts.In this article there exist some words which used after Han Dynasty,and some words had a very long historical evolution process,from this aspect,it could testify that Tsinghua bamboo Manuscripts was forged by the present-day people.The researcher of Tsinghua bamboo manuscripts had already suspected the forgery of words in Qiye(耆夜).However,they did not point out their doubts honestly.On the contrary,they applied the masked annotations to distort the truth and made the bamboo manuscripts seemed to be genuine.How ridiculous it is for some people to regard the Tsinghua bamboo Slips as"the roots of Chinese civilization"!

【关键词】 清华简耆夜燕礼饮至
【Key words】 Tsinghua Bamboo SlipsQiyeProtocol of BanquetProtocol of Drinking
  • 【文献出处】 湖南大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年03期
  • 【分类号】K877.5
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】348
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络