【摘要】 为了实质公正地处理刑事案件,必须把违法阻却事由分成三类:一是法定违法阻却事由,二是典型超法规违法阻却事由,三是非典型超法规违法阻却事由。非典型超法规违法阻却事由是指形式上符合犯罪客观要件且侵害了刑法法益的行为,由于保护或促进了当地社区绝大多数人的现实生产、生活利益,当地群众普遍认为不违法,所以虽然不符合法定违法阻却事由和典型超法规违法阻却事由的条件,但根据利益权衡仍能阻却刑事违法的情况。在刑法理论和司法实践中承认和采纳非典型超法规违法阻却事由具有合理性,但必须严格掌握它的构成要件,深刻理解其阻却违法的根据仍在于利益权衡。更多还原

【Abstract】 In order to handle criminal cases in a just way,justifiable causes must be divided into three categories: the statutory justifiable cause,the typical supra- law justifiable cause,and the atypical supra- law justifiable cause. Atypical supra- law justifiable cause refers to a specific situation where an act encroaches on criminal legal interests and conforms to the objective circumstances of a crime in form,but because of the protection or the promotion effect brought by such act on local community’s rights and interests of production and living standards,it is not deemed as illegal by the local people. Thus,although it does not conform to the conditions of the statutory justifiable cause or the typical supra- law justifiable cause,the criminal act can be justified according to the benefits balance. It is reasonable to adopt the atypical supra- law justifiable cause in judicial practice and criminal law theory on the condition that its constitutive requirements have been fully grasped,and that the ground of justification still lies in the benefits balance.更多还原