节点文献

3种C反应蛋白检测方法的比较

Comparison of three methods for measuring C reaction protein

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 冯晖赵进马晶

【Author】 Feng Hui;Zhao Jin;Ma Jing;Center for Clinical Laboratory,People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region;

【机构】 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院临床检验中心

【摘要】 目的比较3种检测C反应蛋白方法的检测结果。方法收集该院100例就诊患者,分别采用3种不同的C反应蛋白检测方法分析血液中C反应蛋白浓度。结果相关性分析表明,免疫比浊法和免疫层析法检测结果的相关性较高(r=0.992 0)。方差分析发现,采用免疫比浊法检测的C反应蛋白浓度正常者中,个体间C反应蛋白浓度间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而C反应蛋白异常者中,个体间差异不显著(P>0.05),所有受试对象个体间C反应蛋白浓度差异也具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 C反应蛋白检测对于诊断炎症有重要意义。

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the results of three methods for measuring C reaction protein.Methods 100 patients were collected from our hospital,and three different methods for measuring C reaction protein were used to analyze the level of C reaction protein.Results Correlation analysis showed that the correlation between immunoturbidimetric assay and immunochromatography was higher.The differences of three methods assayed the C reaction protein were significant(P<0.05)among normal people by the variance analysis,but had not statistical significance among abnormal people(P>0.05).The differences among all of test people were significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Detection of C reaction protein was important for diagnose inflammatory diseases.

  • 【文献出处】 国际检验医学杂志 ,International Journal of Laboratory Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年11期
  • 【分类号】R446.6
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】471
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络