【摘要】 目的:通过对86例不同方式腹股沟疝修补术患者的近、远期随访,比较传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术对腹股沟疝治疗的临床疗效。方法:收集临床及随访资料完整并行疝修补术者86例,其中行传统疝修补术者47例(对照组),无张力疝修补术39例(治疗组),对两组患者的临床治疗效果进行比较分析。结果:治疗组较对照组近、远期临床疗效更优,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无张力修补术是治疗腹股沟疝较好的手术方式,该术式操作简单,且近、远期疗效较好适于在基层推广。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:To compare the traditional hernioplasty and plug mesh hernia repair in the clinical treatment effect of inguinal hernia through a short and long-term follow-up of 86 patients with inguinal hernia.Methods: 86 cases of inguinal hernia patients with complete clinic and follow-up data were divided into traditional hernia repair in 47 cases(control group) and tension free hernia repair in 39 cases(treatment group), and compared the two group clinical effects. Results:The treatment group was superior clinical efficacy compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion:Tension free herniorrhaphy for treatment of inguinal hernia operation was better, the operation was simple, effective, and suitable for promotion in the primary hospital.更多还原