【摘要】 目的:调查兰州市男性城区工厂工人和农民工生活质量及焦虑状况。方法:采用整群抽样的方法,使用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、生活质量综合评定问卷(成人用)(GQOL-74)调查兰州市男性工厂工人和农民工2917人的生活质量及焦虑状况。结果:①从生活质量四个维度来看,城区工厂工人在物质生活、心理功能及社会功能维度评分均高于于农民工,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);②从各因子来看,城区工厂工人和农民工在住房、社区服务、生活环境、经济状况、性功能、精神紧张度、负性情感、认知功能、自尊、社会支持、工作与学习、业余娱乐生活及生活质量总体评价等因子方面差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);③在焦虑状况方面,城区工厂工人和农民工跟常模比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两者相互比较差异也有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:兰州市农民工生活质量明显不及城区工厂工人,焦虑情绪较之城区工厂工人更严重,足以引起大家的重视。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:Investigation of Lanzhou male city factory workers and migrant workers in urban quality of life and anxiety status.Methods:Adopt the whole flock of sampling method,using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),quality of life questionnaire(for adult)(GQOL-74) survey of male factory workers and migrant workers in Lanzhou City 2917 persons’ quality of life and anxiety status.Results:①From four dimensions of quality of life,urban factory workers in material life,mental function and social function dimensions score were higher than for migrant workers,the difference was statistically significant(t = 3.04,3.43,2.88;P < 0.05);②From the view of each factor,urban factory workers and migrant workers in the housing,community service,living environment,economic status,sexual function,mental tension,negative emotion,cognitive function,self-esteem,social support,work and learning,amateur entertainment life and quality of life overall assessment factors were statistically significant difference(t = 7.52,4.32,3.33,2.75,2.76,-2.01,1.98,1.97,3.27,4.12,2.21,-2.96,3.43;P<0.05);③During the anxiety condition,urban factory workers and migrant workers with norm comparisons were statistically significant difference(t= 15.64,21.74;P <0.05);the difference is statistically significant(t =-4.46;P < 0.05).Conclusion:Quality of life of migrant workers significantly less than urban factory workers in Lanzhou,anxiety emotion than the urban factory workers more serious,sufficient to cause everybodys attention.更多还原