节点文献

离子色谱法测定饮用水中四种阴离子与传统化学法的比较

Comparison of traditional chemical method and ion chromatographic determination for four anions in drinking water

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄文锋张骊肖琳

【Author】 HUANG Wen-feng,ZHANG Li,XIAO Lin (Huadu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Guangzhou 510800,China)

【机构】 广东省广州市花都区疾病预防控制中心

【摘要】 目的:离子色谱法与传统化学法对饮用水中氟化物、氯化物、硝酸盐和硫酸盐的含量进行测定和比较。方法:离子色谱法和传统化学法分别从取样量与检测时间、加标回收率和精密度、准确度和检出限进行分析和比较。结果:离子色谱法同时测定4种阴离子的检测时间、检出限、加标回收率和精密度等均优于传统化学法。结论:离子色谱法比传统化学法操作简单、准确和灵敏,能同时测定多种离子。

【Abstract】 Objective:The ion chromatography and the traditional chemical method were compared in the determination of fluoride,chloride,nitrate and sulfate content in drinking water.Methods: Ion chromatography and the traditional chemical method were compared through the analysis of the sample volume and testing time,the recovery rate and precision,accuracy and detection limit.Results: Ion chromatography for simultaneous determination of four kinds of anion is better than the traditional chemical method in detection time,detection limit,the recovery and precision.Conclusion: Ion chromatography is more simple,accurate and sensitive than traditional chemical method,and can simultaneously determine various ions.

【关键词】 离子色谱阴离子饮用水
【Key words】 Ion chromatographyAnionsDrinking water
  • 【文献出处】 中国卫生检验杂志 ,Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年02期
  • 【分类号】O657.75;R123.1
  • 【被引频次】11
  • 【下载频次】461
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络