节点文献

两种梅毒血清试验方法的效果评价

The results evaluation of two kinds of syphilis test

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 郑慧斐郭永炼谢加奖

【Author】 ZHENG Hui-fei;GUO Yong-lian;XIE Jia-jiang;Xiamen Xianyue Hospital;

【机构】 福建省厦门市仙岳医院检验科

【摘要】 目的:探讨梅毒螺旋体明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)和梅毒血浆反应素快速试验(RPR)检测梅毒的特异性和敏感性。方法:对3681例待检者、113例梅毒患者、100例正常人进行RPR与TPPA联合检测和分析。结果:3681例待检者中,共检测出RPR阳性66例,阳性率为1.79%,TPPA阳性79例,阳性率为2.15%。113例梅毒患者中,共检测出RPR阳性86例,阳性率为76.1%,TPPA阳性113例,阳性率为100%。100例健康体检者RPR和TPPA结果均为阴性。结论:TPPA和RPR都是快速有效的梅毒检测方法,但确诊必须结合病史、临床表现和实验室检测综合分析。

【Abstract】 Objective: To analyse the specificity and sensibility of treponema pallidum antibody particles agglutinate test( TPPA) and rapid plasma reagin circle card test( RPR) in detection of syphilis. Methods: 3681 cases of non- syphilis,113 cases of syphilis and 100 cases of normal person were performed RPR and TPPA joint test and analysis. Results: Among 3681 cases of non- syphilis patients,66 cases were detected in RPR positive( 1. 79%),79 cases were detected in TPPA positive( 2. 15%). Among 113 cases of syphilis,86 cases were detected in RPR positive( 76. 1%),113 cases were detected in TPPA positive( 100%). The positive rates of RPR and TPPA of 100 cases of healthy volunteers all were 0. 0%. Conclusion: Both of TPPA and RPR are fast and efficient ways on syphilis diagnosis,but a definite diagnosis must be made based on the comprehensive analysis of medical history,clinical manifestation and laboratory test.

【关键词】 梅毒TPPARPR
【Key words】 SyphilisTPPARPR
  • 【文献出处】 中国民康医学 ,Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年24期
  • 【分类号】R446.62
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】26
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络