节点文献

附子不同炮制方法比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Different Processing Methods in Aconiti Lateralis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 周林任玉珍杜杰张晓莉金锋

【Author】 ZHOU Lin1,2*,REN Yu-zhen1,DU Jie1,ZHANG Xiao-li3,JIN Feng4 (1.China National Corp.of Traditional & Herbal Medicine,Beijing 100195,China; 2.Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100102,China; 3.Sichuan Jiangyou Zhongba T&S Development Co.LTD of Aconite Lateralis Praeparata,Jiangyou 621700,China; 4.Henan University of TCM,Zhengzhou 450008,China)

【机构】 中国药材公司中药质量控制技术国家工程实验室北京中医药大学中药学院四川江油中坝附子科技发展有限公司河南中医学院

【摘要】 目的:采用高效液相色谱法分析附子不同炮制品中6个生物碱的含量,研究《中国药典》炮制法、蒸制法、炒制法之间的差异。方法:采用《中国药典》2010年版附子含量测定项下方法检测;运用SPSS17.0统计分析软件进行数据处理。结果:各成分分离良好;蒸附片、炒附片、黑顺片、白附片、淡附片、炮附片中双酯型生物碱的量都得到有效降低,但蒸附片和炒附片中单酯型生物碱的含量明显增加。结论:蒸制法、炒制法与《中国药典》炮制法一样,具有相同的炮制减毒能力,但蒸制法和炒制法又能增加毒性小、疗效好的单酯型生物碱类的量,优于《中国药典》炮制法。

【Abstract】 Objective:By simultaneous quantification of 6 aconitum alkaloid compounds in Aconiti Lateralis to compare the differences from the different processing methods.Methods:The method of aconitum alkloids in Aconiti Lateralis is according to Chinese Pharmacopoeia(2010 ed).Data is carried out by SPSS 17.0 statistical analysis software.Results:The 6 compounds were separated clearly.The amount of diester-type aconitum alkaloid compounds have been effectively reduced by pharmacopoeia method,steamed method and frying method,but the monoester-type aconitum alkaloid content in zhengfupian and chaofupian was significantly increased.Conclusion:Pharmacopoeia method,steamed method and frying method have the same processing attenuated ability.The contents of monoester-type aconitum alkaloid,which had low toxicity and high curative effect,are increased greatly in using the last two methods,better than the pharmacopoeia method.

【基金】 中医药行业科研专项——附子等中药炮制方法传承与规范化应用研究项目(201107008)
  • 【文献出处】 中国现代中药 ,Modern Chinese Medicine , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年02期
  • 【分类号】R283
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】879
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络