【摘要】 目的对中西医结合治疗与西医综合治疗急性缺血性中风的方案进行经济学评价。方法利用本院国家"十一五"科技攻关项目所建立的数据库,进行中西医结合治疗方案与西医综合治疗方案对急性缺血性中风的疗效比较及经济学评价。结果 2组在治疗14 d后,其NIHSS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),疗效比较2组之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。与西医综合治疗方案相比,中西医结合治疗急性缺血性中风的费用显著下降,2者之间具有显著性的差异(P<0.01)。结论选用中西医结合治疗方案治疗急性缺血性中风较经济,但远期疗效尚需进一步的观察。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the economic effect between the group with the combined therapy of traditional Chinese medicine( TCM) and western medicine and the control group with western medicine only in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Methods The database building in a large scale of clinical trial was used to observe the clinical therapeutic effects and economic effects between the 2 groups. Results After 14 d of treatment,there was no significant difference in the NIHSS score and clinical therapeutic effects between the 2 groups( P > 0. 05). The cost of TCM was obviously lower than that of the west medicine( P < 0. 01). Conclusion Contrasted with the west medicine group,the TCM group is more economical in the treatment of ischemic stroke. However,the long-term outcomes need to be observed in more detail.更多还原