【摘要】 "核心"对"边陲"学术文化的长期影响与全面支配,不仅造成了台湾地区整个文化传统的严重"萎缩",而且也造成了台湾地区人文社会科学学术主体性和独立性的彻底"迷失"。社会科学"中国化"运动的兴起,正是在"核心一边陲"结构部分松动之后台湾人文社会科学界为重建学术主体性而做的一次重大努力,是反对西方特别是美国学术"殖民"、追求学术独立的一场重要抗争。至于这场运动由早先的方法论反思向稍后的研究典范转移之推展,一方面固然与20世纪70年代美国科学哲学领域的"典范革命"有关,但另一方面,也是更重要的方面,则与台湾社会由"一元"向"多元"的结构性变迁以及随社会结构变迁而来的社会价值观念由"一元"向"多元"的递嬗相辉映。更多还原

【Abstract】 This essay uses "Core-Periphery" theory as its basic analyzing model.The author believes that the long-term domination and influence the "core" to the "Periphery",not only has caused the shrink of Taiwan’s culture and tradition,but also caused the "lost" of Taiwan social sciences’ entity and independence.The " Sinicization" movement,happened right after the " Core-Periphery" relationship started to fall apart,and the movement itself is a great effort that local academic group made to rebuild its own entity,as well as to fight against the colonization Western and American academic and to pursue its independence.The movement itself,at the beginning,focus on the methodology,and has then turned to the transfer of paradigm.The turning in one aspect,has been influence by the "revolution of paradigm" happened in America,1970s.But in another aspect,which is more important,is also the result of the changes,which has happened in Taiwan’s social structure and the values’ field since 1980s.更多还原