节点文献

同一实验室条件下不同隔声测量方法的探讨

Two methods for sound insulation measurement in same laboratory condition

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 钱中昌寇毅伟刘碧龙刘克

【Author】 QIAN Zhong-chang;KOU Yi-wei;LIU Bi-long;LIU Ke;Key Laboratory of Noise and Vibration Research,Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;Shanghai Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology;

【机构】 中国科学院声学研究所噪声与振动重点实验室上海市计量测试技术研究院

【摘要】 大型构件隔声量的实验室测量有两种方法:一种是传统的隔声室测量方法,可参照国家标准GB/T 19889.3-2005;另一种可称之为声强法,可参照国际标准ISO 15186-1:2000。参照以上两种方法,分别测量了三块板的隔声量。结果发现,在中高频段,两种方法测量结果几乎一致,而在低频段(300Hz以下),声强扫描法测量结果明显低于传统方法。为了找出造成低频段测量结果差异的原因,还研究了吸声材料、探头间距等因素对测量结果的影响。

【Abstract】 There are two methods for measuring the sound reduction index(SRI) of large partitions. One is a conventional method which requires a sound proof chamber by reference to GB/T 19889.3-2005; the other is called sound intensity method by reference to ISO 15186-1:2000. The SRIs of three panels are measured according to these two methods. The results indicate that the SRI is almost consistent with the two methods in the middle and high frequency region. When the frequency is below 400 Hz, the SRI measured by sound intensity method is less than that measured by the conventional method. The effects of sound absorbing materials and the distance of spacers used in sound intensity probe are also investigated.

【基金】 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2012CB720204)
  • 【文献出处】 声学技术 ,Technical Acoustics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年06期
  • 【分类号】TB53;TU112.2
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】177
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络