节点文献

不同仪器检测尿密度方法的比较

Comparison of detection results of urine specific gravity analyzed by different apparatus

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄伟娟黄海樱陈波张云聪

【Author】 HUANG Wei-juan1,HUANG Hai-ying2,CHEN Bo2,ZHANG Yun-cong3(1.Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510623,China;2.Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical Collage,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510260,China;3.The Medicine Laboratory Department of Guangzhou Medical Collage,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510300,China)

【机构】 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心广州医学院第二附属医院检验科广州医学院医学检验系

【摘要】 目的探讨临床科室使用不同方法学原理的仪器测定尿密度的差异性。方法收集临床444份随机尿分别用AX-4280尿液分析仪和COBAS-U-411尿液干化学分析仪测定尿密度,并对结果进行统计学对比分析。结果当pH为6.5~7.5时,两种仪器检测结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);当pH<6.5时,两种仪器检测结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。当尿液中蛋白为阳性时,两种仪器检测结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。当尿液中糖为阳性时,两种仪器检测结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床不同仪器检测尿密度的结果具有差异性。

【Abstract】 Objective To study the difference of urine specific gravity detected by apparatus utilizing different methodology principle.Methods 444 urine samples were examined with AX-4280 analyzer and COBAS-U-411 analyzer,and the results were statistically compared.Results The mean values of urinary specific gravity were without statistical difference between the two analyzers(P>0.05),when pH was 6.5-7.0,but with statistical difference(P<0.05),when pH was less than 6.5.The mean values of urinary specific gravity were without statistical difference(P>0.05) in samples with positive detection result of glucose,but with statistical difference(P<0.05) in samples with positive detection result of protein.Conclusion There might be different detection result of urine specific gravity using different apparatus.

  • 【文献出处】 检验医学与临床 ,Laboratory Medicine and Clinic , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年09期
  • 【分类号】R446.1
  • 【下载频次】41
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络