节点文献

马克思主义哲学体系问题再审视——兼评马克思主义哲学领域的几部新著

Re-examine Philosophical System of Marxism——Reviewing Several New Books on Marxist Philosophy

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨学功

【Author】 YANG Xue-gong(Department of Philosophy,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)

【机构】 北京大学哲学系

【摘要】 "马克思主义哲学"既是一个复合概念,又是一个集合概念。马克思本人并没有刻意构建一个概念和范畴演绎的哲学叙述体系;恩格斯和列宁虽对马克思主义哲学做了系统化的尝试和设想,但也未构建一个完整的叙述体系。真正构建起马克思主义哲学叙述体系的是20世纪二三十年代的苏联学者,这种体系曾被奉为毋庸置疑的"权威体系",又被视为真理化身的"科学体系",同时还被当作普遍推广的"教学体系"。如今,这种"三合一"的体系已经瓦解。在当下中国的高等教育中,作为意识形态的"权威体系"与专业的"教学体系"应该相对分化,在保留"权威体系"的同时,重构教科书体系是应有之义。

【Abstract】 "Marxist philosophy" is both a complex concept,and a collection of concepts.Marx himself did not deliberately build a philosophical narrative system with concepts and categories.Although Engels and Lenin made attempts and projections about building a systematic Marxist philosophy,they did not build a complete narrative system.The people who really built the Marxist philosophical narrative system were Soviet scholars in the 1920s and 1930s.This system had been regarded as the "authoritative system" that allowed no doubt,as well as the embodiment of truth,or "the scientific system".Meanwhile,it was generally promoted as the proper "teaching system".Today,this "three-in-one" system has been disintegrated.In China’s current higher education,the ideological "authoritative system" and the professional "teaching system" should be relatively separated.While preserving the "authoritative system",we need to rebuild the proper meaning of the textbook.

  • 【文献出处】 江苏行政学院学报 ,The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年01期
  • 【分类号】B0-0
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】492
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络